State v. Pratt
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.
Daniel Eugene Pratt (“defendant”) appeals his conviction of robbery with a dangerous weapon. For the reasons stated herein, we hold that defendant received a trial free of prejudicial error.
The pertinent facts of the instant appeal are as follows. At approximately 5:00 p.m. on or about 14 March 2001, while Travis Lawrence (“Lawrence”) waited for a church bus on Lansing Drive in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, defendant approached and asked Lawrence for his cell phone. Lawrence refused. Defendant then pulled a toboggan over his face and said, “This is a robbery.”…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- United States v. Milton L. McCaskillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SeeligCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. LucasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- State v. LandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Call v. PolkDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2006
- State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.