Legal Opinion

State v. Pratt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 2003No. COA02-1364PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.

Daniel Eugene Pratt (“defendant”) appeals his conviction of robbery with a dangerous weapon. For the reasons stated herein, we hold that defendant received a trial free of prejudicial error.

The pertinent facts of the instant appeal are as follows. At approximately 5:00 p.m. on or about 14 March 2001, while Travis Lawrence (“Lawrence”) waited for a church bus on Lansing Drive in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, defendant approached and asked Lawrence for his cell phone. Lawrence refused. Defendant then pulled a toboggan over his face and said, “This is a robbery.”…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. United States v. Milton L. McCaskillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  4. State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SeeligCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. State v. LucasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  3. State v. LandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. Call v. PolkDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2006
  5. State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API