Jacques, Admx. v. Dayton Power Light Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By HORNBECK, PJ.
This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment dismissing plaintiff’s second amended petition after a general demurrer had been sustained thereto. We hereinafter refer to the second amended petition as the petition.
Plaintiff’s action was for damages for the wrongful death of her husband who came to his death when a boom scoop came into contact with high voltage uninsulated wires maintained and operated by defendant.
The demurrer was sustained by the Common Pleas Judge upon the proposition that the amended petition of the plaintiff suggested his contributory…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hayden v. Paramount Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Morton's Adm'r v. Kentucky-Tennessee Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- Stackpole v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Sweatman v. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Buell v. Utica Gas & Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. ClairCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Hall v. Lorain-Medina Rural Electric Co-Operative, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957
- Lazar v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
- Grabill v. Worthington Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Thomas v. NewmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.