Legal Opinion
Martin v. K & K PROPERTIES, INC.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 30, 1987No. B009841PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KENNARD, J. *
Respondents in this matter are William Everett Kane, Barbara Kelly, and K&K Properties, Inc. They are the original plaintiffs and cross-defendants. Appellants are William W. Martin, Richard L. Noble, Robert E. Mosher, and the Legal Action Committee for Marlin Investments. The committee represents some 400 creditors in an underlying bankruptcy action filed in the federal court in 1976. The committee was formed to protect the creditors’ interests and to pursue legal actions against respondents. Appellants are the original defendants and cross-complainants.
Appellants appeal…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Tresway Aero, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Moran v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Salas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Supreme Court · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Baccus v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Mitchell v. Frank R. Howard Memorial HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Freedman v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Lauriton v. Carnation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- People Ex Rel. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development Commisson v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.