Lee v. Secretary of State of California
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSELYN LEE, 7 Case No. 20-cv-01507-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 9 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED SECRETARY OF STATE OF 10 CALIFORNIA, 11 Defendant. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff Joselyn Lee, pro se, applied to proceed in forma pauperis and the Court granted 15 her application. See Docket No. 8. The Court now reviews the sufficiency of Lee’s complaint to 16 determine whether it satisfies 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Because the complaint does not appear 17 to plausibly state a claim, Lee is ORDERED TO…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.