Legal Opinion

Smith v. Rucker

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 2, 2004No. 3733PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HEARN, C.J.:

This case asks us to determine whether an estate owned by Ernest Smith and his wife, Joanne Rucker, is subject to partition. The case was heard by a master-in-equity, who partitioned the property after finding that the parties owned it as joint tenants with rights of survivorship, a cotenancy subject to partition. Wife appeals, arguing the property is not subject to partition because she and her Husband own the property as tenants in common for life with indestructible survivorship rights. We affirm.

FACTS

Husband and Wife married in June 2000. On August 17, 2000, Wife deeded…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Green v. CannadySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
  3. Bellamy v. BellamyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  4. Lake View Acres Development Co. v. TindalCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Jenkins v. JenkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1817

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of Sherman Ex Rel. Maddock v. Estate of Sherman Ex Rel. SnodgrassCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API