Green v. Cannady
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Action by Mary E. N. Green against T. W. Cannady et al. Erom Circuit decree, defendants appeal. No citations. cite: As to construction of deeds: 23 S. C., 235; 28 S. C., 129; 35 S. C., 327; 42 S. C., 345.
1Opinion of the Court
June 5, 1907. The opinion of the Court was delivered by The plaintiff brought this action for the partition of two and three-fourths acres of land in Laurens County, alleging that she is entitled to five-sixteenths thereof, as tenant in common with Thomas W. Cannady, whose interest was seven-sixteenths, and with Mary A. Cannady and Nancy E. Rhodes, each of whom was alleged to own two-sixteenths. It is now conceded that the defendant, Thomas W. Cannady, has acquired the interests of William A. Cannady and Nancy E. Rhodes and owns all of the whole except what may be found to belong to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCrady v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
- McLeod v. TarrantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1893
- Donegan v. DoneganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Georgia, Railway Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
- Varn v. VarnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Strout v. BurgessSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
- Wilson ex rel. Otis v. JerniganSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
- Hernandez v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Lutz v. DutmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Smith v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.