Legal Opinion
Doe v. Tenet
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 29, 2003No. 01-35419PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge BERZON. Dissent by Judge TALLMAN.
OPINION
BERZON, Circuit Judge: **
Jane and John Doe — fictitious names, adopted for this litigation for reasons that will appear — assert that they performed espionage activities on behalf of the United States against a former Eastern bloc country. The Central Intelligence Agency (the “CIA”), they say, assured them that it would provide assistance in resettling in the United States as well as lifetime financial and other support. According to the Does, the CIA has now reneged on its obligation of support. The United States will neither confirm…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McGuire v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Binyam Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United Aeronautical Corp. v. UsafCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Herrera v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2004
- Yerington Ford, Inc. v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.