Legal Opinion
Stephen Thomas Haar v. Michael Hanrahan
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 1, 1983No. 82-1287PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
Stephen Haar appeals from an order of the federal district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. His petition asserts that New Mexico refused him a jury trial in violation of his federal constitutional rights.
I
Mr. Haar was charged with two offenses, aggravated battery 1 and criminal damage to property, 2 both arising out of the same incident. The aggravated battery charge carried a maximum penalty of one year’s imprisonment 3 while the criminal damage to property charge carried a maximum sentence of six months. 4 The case was tried in the magistrate…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Cheff v. SchnackenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- State v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- United States v. Mildred P. CoppinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Kevin L. BencheckCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Vallejos v. BarnhartNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.