Legal Opinion

Harris v. DePencier

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 19, 1981No. 8020SC946PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

The threshold question we must consider is whether an immediate appeal lies from Judge Lane’s order. See, Bailey v. Gooding, 301 N.C. 205, 208, 270 S.E. 2d 431, 433 (1980). Judge Lane’s order did not adjudicate all the claims or the rights and liabilities of all the parties joined in plaintiff’s action. It finally adjudicated only the rights and liabilities of two of the parties, the two corporate defendants. Under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 54 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, such a final determination of the rights and liabilities of one or more but less than all of the parties in a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Tridyn Industries, Inc. v. American Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Bailey v. GoodingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wilson Heights Church of God v. AutryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API