Legal Opinion
Mumford v. Coghlin
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 21, 1924PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
This is an action to recover the balance of $2,000, and interest, alleged to be due on a promissory note. The maker of the note was Coghlin-Wilson Electric Company and it was signed on behalf of the company by the treasurer (the defendant), and indorsed by him, one McLaughlin, and one Wilson. It was dated December 1, 1916, and was payable to the plaintiff at its place of business six months after date.
The plaintiff called as a witness one Frazer, a notary public, who testified that he protested the note and notified the three indorsers by depositing notices in a mail box on Summer Street in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- London v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Costello v. CrowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- Daniels v. DanielsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Adams v. CoulliardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Prudential Trust Co. v. HayesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Grady v. Collins Transportation Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
- Commonwealth v. O'RourkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Commonwealth v. TorrealbaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Phillips v. VorenbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- A. Belanger & Sons, Inc. v. United States of America for the Use and Benefit of National U. S. Radiator CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.