Legal Opinion
Flaacke v. Winona Mills Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 30, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.
The plaintiff in his appeal attacks the finding of the court last recited, but as he has taken no steps to bring the evidence before us, we are in no position to review it. Viewed from the standpoint of the other facts found, the conclusion of the trial court would seem to be entirely reasonable.
The plaintiff contends that he has a right to bring and prosecute the action which the courts of this State may not deny to him. It is true that in certain instances the receiver of a corporation appointed by the courts of one State becomes so vested with title to the property of the corporation,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Converse v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Howarth v. LombardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Matter of Accounting of WaiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Sterrett Ex Rel. Alabama Trust & Savings Co. v. Second National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Catlin v. Wilcox Silver-Plate Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wheaton v. City of PutnamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Cohen v. La VinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- O'Connell v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1939