Legal Opinion
Kimball v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided October 15, 2003No. 09-03-041 CRPublished
1Opinion of the Court
119 S.W.3d 463 (2003)
Matthew Shane KIMBALL, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 09-03-041 CR.
Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.
Submitted October 6, 2003.
Decided October 15, 2003.
Peter F. Doyle, Jr., Port Arthur, for appellant.
Tom Maness, Criminal Dist. Atty., Rodney D. Conerly, Asst. Criminal Dist. Atty., Beaumont, for state.
Before McKEITHEN, C.J., BURGESS and GAULTNEY, JJ.
OPINION
STEVE McKEITHEN, Chief Justice.
Matthew Shane Kimball appeals from a conviction for burglary of a habitation and an order revoking his community supervision. By two issues, Kimball complains that the trial…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cobb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Ex Parte MaddingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Stevens v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
- Levy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Guzman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.