Legal Opinion
State v. Hannibal
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 27, 2010No. A10-120PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
In this appeal pursuant to Minn. R.Crim. P. 28.04, subd. 1(2), appellant State of Minnesota challenges respondent’s sentence as “based upon a guilty plea that is per se invalid,” arguing that the district court improperly inserted itself into plea negotiations by promising respondent a probationary sentence. We affirm.
FACTS
The state charged respondent Benjamin Hannibal with first-degree and second-degree assault, in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 609.221, subd. 1, 609.222, subd. 1 (2008), and terroristic threats, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.713, subd. 1 (2008), based on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. RourkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- In Re the Welfare of C. W. S.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. AnyanwuCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jetaun Helen Wheeler v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017