Legal Opinion

St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company v. Duke University Leonard R. Prosnitz, and Raymond U

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 6, 1988No. 87-3768Published

1Opinion of the Court

849 F.2d 133

47 Ed. Law Rep. 405

ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

DUKE UNIVERSITY; Leonard R. Prosnitz, Defendants-Appellants,

and

Raymond U, Defendant.

No. 87-3768.

United States Court of Appeals,

Fourth Circuit.

Argued May 4, 1988.

Decided June 22, 1988.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Sept. 6, 1988.

Robert A. Burgoyne (Fulbright & Jaworski, Laura B. Luger, Moore & Van Allen, on brief), for defendants-appellants.

Joseph W. Yates, III, Barbara B. Weyher (Yates, Fleishman, McLamb & Weyher, on brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. State Capital Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Mazza v. Medical Mut. Ins. Co. of NCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API