Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Bartholomew v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund & Compcare Health Services Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 2006No. 2004AP2592Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPatience Drake Roggensack, J.

¶ 172. (concurring in part and dissenting in part). The lead opinion concludes that our recent decision in Maurin v. Hall, 2004 WI 100, 274 Wis. 2d 28, 682 N.W.2d 866, should be overruled in regard to Maurin's holding that the legislature established a single cap on the recovery of all noneconomic damages resulting from an occurrence of medical malpractice. Lead opinion, ¶ 16. The lead opinion is driven by its conclusion that Maurin "fails to take into account the well-established distinction in Wisconsin tort law between actions for noneconomic damages for predeath claims and a 'wrongful…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Johnnie F Shinholster v. Annapolis HospMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Ferdon Ex Rel. Petrucelli v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Maurin v. HallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API