Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Frangos

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 9, 1945No. Appeal, 19PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ross, J.,

Emanuel M. Frangos, defendant, was indicted and convicted under the Act of June 24,1939, P. L. 872, sec tion 511, 18 PS 4511, for keeping and maintaining a disorderly house. He maintained a restaurant in the basement and ground floor in a building on the northwest corner of West King and North Prince Streets in the City of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, and also had a license for the retail sale of beer.

The Act of June 24, 1939, supra, under which the defendant was indicted is as follows: “Whoever keeps and maintains a common, ill-governed and disorderly house or place, to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ParkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Commonwealth v. TauzaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Commonwealth v. TouriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Commonwealth v. CamwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Commonwealth v. CicconeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FisherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Commonwealth v. GreerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Clock Bar, Inc. AppealDauphin County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1966
  4. Commonwealth v. MATCHESONSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Commonwealth v. MATCHESONSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API