Legal Opinion
Kitty Hawk Aircargo, Inc. v. Chao
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 20, 2005No. 04-10860PublishedCited by 143 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENNIS, Circuit Judge:
Intervenors Airline Pilots Association (ALPA) and Hal Winters appeal the dis trict court’s granting of summary judgment to the plaintiff, Kitty Hawk Aircargo, Inc. The district court enjoined the defendant, the Secretary of the United States Department of Labor (the Secretary), from implementing, against Kitty Hawk, a ruling of the Department of Labor’s Administrative Review Board (ARB) concluding that pilots are “service employees” subject to the prevailing wage requirements of the McNamara-O’Hara Service Contract Act (SCA). We conclude that Kitty Hawk lacked standing…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Diamond v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- White v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Emery Worldwide Airlines, Inc. v. United States and Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by143 opinions
- Association of Flight Attendants-CWA v. United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Wilbur v. LockeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Daniel v. HagelDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- Trout Point Lodge, Limited v. Doug HandshoeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Furlough v. Cage (In Re Technicool Sys., Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.