Legal Opinion

Brown v. Mynard

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Emmet; Adams, J. Trover by Frank E. Brown and another against Jefferson P. Mynard. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Burdick & Obringer, copartners, being indebted to the plaintiffs for machinery, gave them at different times two chattel mortgages, covering separate and distinct property, and covering distinct and different debts. On February 10, 1894, to further secure these *402debts, Burdick gave a bill of sale on 50,000 broom handles, situate at his mill, he having in the meantime succeeded to the partnership property and assumed its indebtedness. On April 28th, he executed another bill of sale to secure the same indebtedness, upon 75,000 more handles. These bills of sale were duly and promptly' filed. June…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cushing v. Seymour, Sabin & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Powell v. GagnonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Tootle, Hosea & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  4. Fletcher v. NeudeceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  5. DeGraff v. BylesMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Croze v. St. Mary's Canal Mineral Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
  2. James v. SpeerMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Wood v. EldredgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API