Legal Opinion

STE Financial Corp. v. Popkin

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided December 23, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fumari J.

This is an action to recover the balance due on apromissory note executed in favor of the plaintiffs assignor by the defendants in partial payment for their purchase of a residential condominium.

The defendants’ answer set forth multiple affirmative defenses and counterclaims which included allegations of breach of contract, breach of implied covenants of good faith and fair dealing, fraudulent inducement, conspiracy, abuse of process, violations of G.Lc. 93A and unclean hands.

After trial, judgment was entered for the plaintiff on both its complaint and the defendants’ counterclaims.

Th…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Danca v. Taunton Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Stella v. CurtisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  3. DiGesse v. Columbia Pontiac Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Dolham v. PetersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Yerid v. MasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Green v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996
  2. Stigman v. Nickerson Enterprises, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API