Legal Opinion

Stigman v. Nickerson Enterprises, Inc.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided August 8, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtin, J.

This is an action by the purchaser of a used motor vehicle to recover for the defendant-seller’s alleged misrepresentation, fraud, breach of implied warranties and G.L.c. 93A unfair and deceptive acts. After a jury-waived trial, a finding for the plaintiff was entered on his misrepresentation and G.L.c. 93A claims, and treble damages, attorney’s fees and costs were awarded. The defendant has appealed pursuant to Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8C.

In late June, 1997, plaintiff Lloyd F. Stigman went to the defendant’s dealership, Americar Superstore, to look at used sports cars. He test drove…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Slaney v. Westwood Auto, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Nei v. BurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Danca v. Taunton Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Robertson v. Gaston Snow & Ely BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. Zimmerman v. KentMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Berkshire-Westwood Graphics Group, Inc. v. DavidsonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007
  2. Dorris v. Danone Waters of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API