Holler v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFansler, J.
The appellant was convicted of receiving stolen goods.
He assigns error upon the overruling of his motion in arrest of judgment and the overruling of his motion for a new trial.
The motion in arrest of judgment was filed after judgment. It is well settled that no question is presented by a motion in arrest of judgment filed after the judgment is entered. Stapert v. State (1924), 195 Ind. 338, 143 N. E. 587; Patton v. State (1923), 192 Ind. 632, 135 N. E. 795.
Several causes for a new trial are included in the motion and presented by the brief.
Witnesses were permitted to identify a brass plate…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Patton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1922
- Stapert v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
- Christ v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
- Eicks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
- Lencionia v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by8 opinions
- Forrester v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Mayes v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- Lindsey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1965
- Hilligoss v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
- Willoughby v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.