Legal Opinion

Sayles v. Allstate Insurance Co.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 10, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-01534PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

A. Richard Caputo, United States District Judge

Presently before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Allstate In*432surance Company (“Allstate”). (Doc, 10.) For the reasons that follow, Allstate’s Motion will.be granted in part and denied in part.

I. Background

The weil-pleaded facts as set forth in' Plaintiffs Complaint (Doc. 1-1) are as follows:

Plaintiff Samantha Sayles (“Sayles”) was insured under an auto insurance policy issued by Defendant Allstate (the “Policy”). (Compl. ¶ 13.) The Policy provided for, inter alia, first-party medical expense benefits up to $5000 per…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. BAUM v. METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. LOUGHERY v. MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  3. LOUGHERY v. MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Limandri v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. MARONDA HOMES, LLC v. MOTORISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API