Legal Opinion

In Re Application of Mich. Con. Gas Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 2008No. Docket 275663PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The Attorney General appeals as of right the December 21, 2006, order of the Public Service Commission (PSC) authorizing Michigan Consolidated Gas Company (MichCon) to add uncollectible expense true-up mechanism (UETM) surcharges to the rates it charged customers for natural gas. We affirm.

The PSC adopted the UETM in an April 28, 2005, order in this case granting rate relief to MichCon. The basic framework of that mechanism is as follows. The PSC estimates an amount of “uncollectible expense” 1 to include in setting MichCon’s rates for a calendar year. After that calendar year has ended, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Consumers Energy Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. In Re Detroit Edison Co. ApplicationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. In re Consumers Energy Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Attorney General v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. In re Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. to Increase RatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. in Re Application of Detroit Edison Company Re Licensing RulesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. in Re Application of Detroit Edison Company Re Licensing RulesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API