Legal Opinion

In re Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. to Increase Rates

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 21, 2011No. Docket Nos. 298830 and 298887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonofrio, J.

In these consolidated cases, appellants, the Association of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity (ABATE) and the Michigan Attorney General, appeal as of right an order of the Michigan Public Service Commission (PSC) that allowed petitioner, Michigan Consolidated Gas Company (Mich Con), to include through charges applied to its ratepayers more than $5 million in funding for the Low-Income and Energy Efficiency Fund (LIEEF). The Attorney General additionally appeals that part of the order that allowed Mich Con to continue to use an uncollectible expense true-up, or tracking, mechanism (UETM) as…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Rovas v. SBC MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In Re Complaint of Rovas Against SbcMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Trahey v. City of InksterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. In re Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. In re Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. to Increase RatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API