Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harris v. Jackson

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 2006No. 2004-SC-000121-DGPublished

1Dissent

Dissenting opinion by

Justice ROACH.

Because I do not think we have jurisdiction over the dead, I dissent. The majority opinion tips its “virtual” hand in its first sentence. It states that a dead person has moved for discretionary review. How is this possible? Clearly, it is not. The fact Wilford Harris is dead and no revivor has ever taken place disposes of this case.

After the trial court dismissed Appel-lees’ claims, they took an appeal against Wilford Harris, a dead person. A court cannot have jurisdiction over a decedent, and action against a decedent is a nullity. See Gailor v. Alsabi,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Philpot v. PattonKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Wilson v. RussellKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. HughesKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Gailor v. AlsabiKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Justice v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API