Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided October 16, 1986Published

1Opinion of the Court

Honorable H. Tati Santiesteban Chairman Natural Resource Committee Texas State Senate P.O. Box 12068 Austin, Texas 78711

Re: Applicability of an energy conservation code to areas which are provided electric utility service by a city but are outside its corporate boundaries

Dear Senator Santiesteban:

You ask whether a home rule city may enforce its energy conservation code outside its boundaries but within its certified electric service area. You inform us that a home rule city adopted an energy conservation code pursuant to section 35 of article 1175, V.T.C.S. You suggest that this statute or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lower Colorado River Authority v. City of San MarcosTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. City of Austin v. JamailCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. City of Lubbock v. South Plains Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. City of New Braunfels v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. State Ex Rel. Richmond Plaza Civic Ass'n v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API