Legal Opinion

State v. Harris

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 2010No. 25461PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Ernest Harris was convicted of two counts of Distribution of a Controlled Substance in violation of SDCL § 22-42-2. He appeals, arguing that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting audio recordings of the two controlled buys of crack cocaine into evidence and by providing the jury with an aiding and abetting instruction. We affirm the trial court.

BACKGROUND

[¶ 2.] In June 2008, a confidential informant working with the Sioux Falls Area Drug Task Force arranged to make a controlled buy of crack cocaine from Harris. Detective Thomas Schmitz of the Sioux Falls…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. CopelandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. State v. McGeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  4. State v. GoodroadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. JuchtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. DowtySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. WhitfieldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Jacquot v. RozumSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. CraigSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API