Legal Opinion

Castro v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 5, 2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*1014Initially, with regard to the charge of harassment, the Attorney General concedes, and we agree, that substantial evidence does not support the finding of guilt (see Matter of Smith v Fischer, 85 AD3d 1481, 1482 [2011]; Matter of Correnti v Fischer, 83 AD3d 1354, 1355 [2011]). Inasmuch as the penalty included a recommended loss of good time, the matter must be remitted to respondent for a redetermination of the penalty (see Matter of Nimmons v Fischer, 85 AD3d 1460, 1462 [2011]; Matter of Correnti v Fischer, 83 AD3d at 1355).

With regard to the stalking charge, an inmate may be found guilty…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BuckleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Smith v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Correnti v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Nimmons v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Washington v. VenettozziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API