Zirin Laboratories International, Inc. v. Mead-Johnson & Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
TALBOT SMITH, District Judge.
1. Plaintiff’s complaint, as first amended, was an action to recover damages caused by defendants’ alleged trademark infringement and unfair competition. Plaintiff alleged that defendants’ product, METRECAL, is an imitation of plaintiff’s products NATURCAL and NATROCAL. Defendants moved for summary judgment under Fed.Rules Civ. Proc. Rule 56(b), 28 U.S.C.A., on the ground that plaintiff’s President, Mr. Benjamin Zirin, admitted in his deposition of September 14, 1961, that plaintiff had not been damaged by defendants’ conduct.
2. Plaintiff subsequently asked leave…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
3Cited by18 opinions
- David ARCHER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MACOMB COUNTY BANK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Emmet WINDSOR, Appellant, v. BETHESDA GENERAL HOSPITAL and Servicemaster Hospital Corporation, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Schewe v. Fairview Estates (In Re Schewe)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1989
- Schutt Manufacturing Co. v. Riddell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- John E. Green Plumbing and Heating Company, Inc. v. Turner Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.