Legal Opinion
Mabe v. San Bernardino County
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 24, 2001No. 98-56561PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD C. TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:
We review the propriety of actions taken during the course of a child abuse investigation and subsequent dependency proceedings. Matilda Mabe sued, on various state and federal grounds, the social worker conducting the investigation, certain supervisors and colleagues, the county agency that employs them, and two individuals who later provided foster care to Mabe’s minor daughter. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of all defendants on all claims. Mabe argues that Appellees are liable for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for their actions in…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Richard H. Hatch, Jr. v. Department for Children, Youth and Their Families (State of Rhode Island), Steven Brown and Mary McKee ProposedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Mabe v. San Bernardino CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- MONTEILH v. County of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.