Legal Opinion

Eo Bianchi, Helen Bianchi v. City of Cupertino, James Sisk

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 12, 1991No. 89-16196Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

944 F.2d 908

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

eo BIANCHI, Helen Bianchi, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

CITY OF CUPERTINO, James Sisk, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-16196.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 9, 1991.

Decided Sept. 12, 1991.

Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API