Eo Bianchi, Helen Bianchi v. City of Cupertino, James Sisk
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
944 F.2d 908
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
eo BIANCHI, Helen Bianchi, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF CUPERTINO, James Sisk, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 89-16196.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted April 9, 1991.
Decided Sept. 12, 1991.
Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.