Legal Opinion

City of Guthrie v. T. W. Harvey Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 8, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the District Court of Logan County; before Jno. H. Burford, District Judge. STATEMENT OE THE CASE. This was an action begun bv the Harvey Lumber company, to recover the value of a building which it alleged that the defendant, the Oity of Guthrie, had converted to its own ude in 1890, 'and for which payment had been refused.

Read the full summary

Error from the District Court of Logan County; before Jno. H. Burford, District Judge. STATEMENT OE THE CASE. This was an action begun bv the Harvey Lumber company, to recover the value of a building which it alleged that the defendant, the Oity of Guthrie, had converted to its own ude in 1890, 'and for which payment had been refused. The amended petition, upon which the case was tried, averred that the plaintiff had contracted, in 1889,. with the provisional government of East Guthrie, for the erection of a building upon lots 23 and 24, block 46, Bast Guthrie; that the city had agreed to pay…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

McAteu, J.:

The assignments of error are arguecf upon the action of the court in overruling the motion of plaintiff for a new trial.

It is stated, as a fact, in the brief of the plaintiff in error, that the evidence offered a.t the trial did not tend to suport the averment that the Harvey Lumber company had oomractied to sell or erect any building whatever for the provisional government of East Guthrie,

The evidence show® that in the spring of 1889, the Harvey Lumber company, which was located in Ohio, had two agents in Oklahoma, one of whom was Alos-an dier, a builder;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. High v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. National Bank of Guthrie v. EarlSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  4. City of Oklahoma City v. T. M. Richardson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dunn v. Modern Foundry & MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Cleveland v. School Dist. No. 79, Grady CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Whitehead v. GormleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Beury Coal & Coke Co. v. County Court of Fayette CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. First Mortgage Loan Co. v. AllweinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API