Winthrop House Ass'n v. Brookside Elm Ltd. Partners
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING AND ORDER
NEVAS, District Judge.
On June 29, 2001, this case was referred to a magistrate judge for a recommenda tion on a single narrow issue: “Did the Declarant properly exclude the implied warranties and/or express warranties?” On December 29, 2003, the magistrate judge reported that the declarant, Brook-side Elm Limited Partners (“Declarant”) (1) sufficiently disclaimed implied warranties under the Connecticut Common Interest Ownership Act (“CIOA”) and (2) could not disclaim express warranties under the CIOA. She also concluded that the plaintiff, Winthrop House Association…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Starfish Condominium Ass'n v. Yorkridge Service Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Linden Condominium Ass'n v. McKennaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Hall Manor Owner's Ass'n v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Pontiere v. James Dinert, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- J. Walter Thompson P.R., Inc. v. Latin Am. Music Co.United States District Court · 2019