(PC) Casey v. Haddad
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DOMINIQUE ZAFIR CASEY, Case No.: 1:21-cv-00855-SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY MOTION 13 v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS SHOULD NOT BE DENIED 14 HADDAD, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Dominique Zafir Casey moves the Court to proceed in forma pauperis in this 18 action. (Doc. 2.) According to the certified account statement submitted by the California 19 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Plaintiff had more than $1,000 in his inmate trust 20 account as of March…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Ardis O. Smart v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden, Folsom Prison, Represa, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- People's Outfitting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933