Legal Opinion

Kendal Doyle and Mindy Doyle v. iO HVAC Controls, Jackson Systems LLC, and Niles C. Mosher

District Court, D. Utah

Decided July 15, 2026No. 2:25-cv-00190Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH KENDAL DOYLE and MINDY DOYLE, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, RESOLVING PLAINTIFFS’ PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS v. iO HVAC CONTROLS, JACKSON Case No. 2:25-cv-00190-JNP-CMR SYSTEMS LLC, and NILES C. MOSHER, Chief District Judge Jill N. Parrish Defendants. Chief Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero Before the court are two motions for partial summary judgment brought by Plaintiffs Kendal Doyle and Mindy Doyle (collectively the “Doyles”). ECF No. 39 (“Pls.’ First Mot.”); ECF No. 53 (“Pls.’ Second Mot.”). For the reasons…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Reed v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API