Legal Opinion

United States v. Guillermo Soto

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 10, 1992No. 91-5226PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant Soto was convicted of knowingly and intentionally conspiring to possess a controlled substance and possessing cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) & 846 and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We reverse his conviction because the government introduced over his objection a post-arrest statement elicited from him while in police custody in violation of his Miranda rights. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 474, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 1628, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).

Soto was stopped for a traffic violation at the Nashville, Tennessee airport. He consented to a search of the car…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Burley Clifton Harryman v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Snow v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  2. United States v. Jean M. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Pacheco-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Jeffrey Thomas Whaley, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. McConerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API