Legal Opinion
United States v. Pacheco-Lopez
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 26, 2008No. 07-5408PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMerritt, J., joined by Cole, J.,
GRIFFIN, J. (pp. 430-38), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
*422OPINION
MERRITT, Circuit Judge.
The defendant, Pedro Pacheco-Lopez (Lopez), challenges the district court’s denial of his request to suppress certain statements made prior to his arrest. The defendant argues that his initial statements—made prior to receiving his Miranda warnings—should have been suppressed because they were responses to a custodial interrogation and do not fall under the “booking exception” to Miranda. Additionally, the defendant argues that his later admission, made after receiving his warning, resulted from…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Hoffner v. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Alford, Cecil EdwardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- United States v. Daryl LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Alvin RayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.