Legal Opinion
Matter of Woodhaven Lumber
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided April 23, 1991PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
123 N.J. 481 (1991)
589 A.2d 135
IN THE MATTER OF WOODHAVEN LUMBER AND MILL WORK.
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ASBURY PARK PRESS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued January 29, 1991.
Decided April 23, 1991.
Samuel J. Marzarella, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (James W. Holzapfel, Ocean County Prosecutor, attorney; Samuel J. Marzarella, on the briefs).
Richard M. Eittreim argued the cause for respondent (McCarter & English, attorneys; Richard M. Eittreim and Penelope M. Taylor, on the briefs).
The opinion of the Court was delivered by…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Zurcher v. Stanford DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Service Armament Co. v. HylandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re VeneziaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Too Much Media, LLC v. HaleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- Kinsella v. WelchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Too Much Media, LLC v. HaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- Trump v. O'BRIENNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.