Legal Opinion

Thiesen v. Hellermann

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 21, 1954No. 36,193PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Christianson, Justice.

Action is brought by plaintiff to recover for personal injuries and property damage resulting from an intersection collision between a car owned and driven by plaintiff and a car owned and driven by defendant. Defendant counterclaims to recover for personal injuries and property damage and for his wife’s medical expenses and loss of her services resulting from the same collision. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff and against defendant on his counterclaim. The trial court granted plaintiff’s motion for .a new trial on the sole issue of damages. Defendant appeals…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wood v. CullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
  2. Flaugh v. Egan Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Bohnen v. GorrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. Marty v. NordbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. Alden v. Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Householder v. Town of ClaytonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. Colgan v. RaymondSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Seydel v. ReuberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. Regan Farmers Union Cooperative v. SwensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Laramie Motors, Inc. v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API