Legal Opinion

Idaho Watersheds Project v. Jones

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 6, 2007No. 06-35844Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

The Joneses, the owners of a family-operated farm and ranch near Challis, Idaho, appeal from the district court’s decision granting the plaintiffs’, Idaho Watershed Project and the Committee for Idaho’s High Desert (collectively “IWP”), motion for attorney’s fees, and denying the Joneses’ motion for attorney’s fees. As this is the second time the parties have been before this court, they are familiar with the facts and proceedings so we need not recite them here.

We review a district court’s award of attorney’s fees under an abuse-of-discretion standard. Ass’n of Cal. Water…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ruckelshaus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Donald Eugene Lambert v. James Blodgett, Donald Eugene Lambert v. James BlodgettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Townsend v. Holman Consulting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Jack B. Buster, A. Lee Petersen v. Ronald E. Greisen Henry P. Head and David L. RatchyeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Tutor-Saliba Corp. v. City of HaileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API