Legal Opinion

Musser v. Murphy

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1930No. 5408PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVarian, J.

Plaintiff brought this action upon a promissory note to recover $4,852.45, interest and attorneys’ fees. Defendant admits the execution of the note, and that no part of the principal or interest has been paid. He alleges that the note represents loans aggregating the principal sum of $2,550, and that the balance of the principal sum mentioned in said note represents compound interest on said sum of $2,550, and a greater sum than ten per cent per annum upon the original sum loaned.

A jury trial was waived by the parties. The court made findings and conclusions of law, and entered judgment for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Newburger-Morris Co. v. . TalcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Easton v. Butterfield Live Stock Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Camp v. BatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1836
  4. Jones v. NossamanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Gay v. BerkeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Williams v. HavensIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Eagle Rock Corp. v. Idamont Hotel Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Watkins & Faber v. WhiteleyUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Bethke v. Idaho Sav. & Loan AssociationIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Dairy Equipment Co. of Utah v. BoehmeIdaho Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API