Legal Opinion

Titsworth v. Titsworth

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 1, 1910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On petition for decree of nullity of marriage.

1Opinion of the Court

Stevenson, V. C.

In this ex parte case the master has reported in favor of a decree of nullity under the statute, on the ground that the petitioner was under eighteen years of age when the marriage ceremony was performed. I cannot concur with the learned master in view of the character and extent of the proofs presented to establish the fact that the petitioner was “under the age of eighteen” when the marriage was solemnized and consummated.

The case is brought under the new law which constitutes paragraph 5 of section 1 of the Divorce act of 1907, permitting a decree of nullity

“at the suit of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wigder v. WigderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  2. In Re AnonymousNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  3. Wilkins v. ZelichowskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  4. Mannaro v. MannaroConnecticut Superior Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API