Legal Opinion

People v. Contreras

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 19, 1968No. Crim. 14264PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, Acting P. J.

The People have appealed from the order of the trial court setting aside an information charging defendant and respondent with possession of marijuana. The order presented for review was entered upon the granting of defendant’s motion made under Penal Code section 995 which authorizes such order upon a showing (1) that “the defendant had not been legally committed by a magistrate;” or (2) that “the defendant had been committed without reasonable or probable cause.”

The determinative issue is whether or not the record supports the trial court’s implied conclusion that the magistrate acted…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. NagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. People v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. People v. CarrilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. People v. GasteltumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Reeves v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Hacker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Hacker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API