Wilson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
The plaintiff in error will be referred to as defendant as in the court below.
The evidence, in large part uncontradicted, discloses a rather unusual state of facts about as follows: On the afternoon of August 6, 1922, several persons who lived at or near Catale, going from Muskogee to their home, passed through Catoosa. Among them was J. T. Gaither and his father, J. F. Gaither. They arrived at Catoosa about 2 or 2:30 in the afternoon, and stopped at a cafe for a meal. They were strangers, and knew no one there. Soon after they entered the cafe and ordered their meal, and while sitting at the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Holmes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- State v. RyanOregon Supreme Court · 1905
- People v. KizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Burns v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1963
- Oxendine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1960
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
- Keesee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.