Legal Opinion
United States v. Lain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 12, 2011No. 10-3201PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
A jury acquitted Defendant Kenneth G. Lain, Jr., of one count of delivering a firearm without a federal license in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(a)(5) and 924(a)(1)(D). After his acquittal, Defendant filed a motion for attorney’s fees under the Hyde Amendment, Pub.L. No. 105-119, § 617, 111 Stat. 2440, 2519 (1997) (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3006A Note). The district court denied his motion, and Defendant appeals. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.
I
During a traffic stop in September 2009 in Shawnee, Kansas, police discovered Defendant possessed a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Fred W. Phelps, Sr. And Edward F. Engel v. Joan Hamilton, in Her Official Capacity as District AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Theodore Stewart FriesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Mario Reyes-RomeroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Louis ManzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- United States v. RamptonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.