Legal Opinion

Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 24, 1985No. C4-85-991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

When their marriage was dissolved in 1982, the parties stipulated to matters of child custody and support, property division, and maintenance. Appellant Curtiss Johnson, the dissolution case respondent, agreed to continue paying maintenance to Rose Johnson until the respondent died or remarried. Appellant remarried in 1985 and discontinued maintenance payments to his former spouse. Rose Johnson brought an action for a modification of the settlement agreement on the grounds of clerical error and mistake. The trial court ordered modification, and Curtiss Johnson appealed.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Shelard National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Karger v. WangerinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Nelson v. VassendenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. Marriage of Egge v. EggeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Hyman Rosen and Harry Grossman v. Westinghouse Electric Supply Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. SCI Minnesota Funeral Services, Inc. v. Washburn-McReavy Funeral Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  2. SCI Minnesota Funeral Services, Inc. v. Washburn-McReavy Funeral Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API