Legal Opinion
Hyman Rosen and Harry Grossman v. Westinghouse Electric Supply Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 24, 1957No. 15634PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Chief Judge.
Appellee brought this action against appellants to recover on a promissory note which on its face appeared to be signed by Northtown Furniture Company, Hyman Rosen and Harry Gross-man. The complaint was in conventional form. In their answer defendants claim that the note was solely an obligation of the maker, Northtown Furniture Company, that they signed the note on behalf of the corporation only in their capacities as officers of the corporation, that the parties to the note did not intend to bind themselves personally and that there was an absence of consideration…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Walden v. SkinnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Murray v. GadsdenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Cabrera v. American Colonial BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Leach v. LeachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Otis Elevator Co. v. Standard Const. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Metro Office Parks Co. v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Angelo Vakas v. Philip ManuelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Farmers Cooperative Company v. Pgi International, Squibb-Taylor, Inc., Cox Manufacturing Company D/B/A Dalton Ag Products, Inc., and Cnh Corp. A/K/A Cnh American, LLC A/S/O Dmi, Inc.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2016
- Duenke v. BrummettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- City Life Dev., Inc. v. Praxus Group, Inc., 88221 (5-3-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.