City of Forney v. Estate of Pinson
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHINSON, Justice.
This suit was instituted by appellees, landowners, against the appellant, City of Forney, seeking to have four 1960 annexation ordinances declared invalid. Appellees and appellant each filed motions for summary judgment. The trial court granted appellees’ motion and entered its judgment declaring the four 1960 annexation ordinances unconstitutional and in all things null and void ab initio. Appellant’s motion was overruled and it has perfected this appeal.
In 1960, appellant’s city council became concerned that the rapid growth of cities to its west would hinder its own…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Western U. T. Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- San Antonio Independent School Dist. v. State Ex Rel. DechmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- City of Arlington v. City of Grand PrairieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
- City of Fort Worth v. Atlas EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- City of Taylor v. Taylor Bedding Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Super Wash, Inc. v. City of White SettlementCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Rose v. Doctors HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Rose v. Doctors HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Super Wash, Inc. v. City of White Settlement, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
- Super Wash, Inc. v. City of White Settlement, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004