Meadows v. Pittsburg County Board of County Commissioners
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Dissent
OP ALA, Justice,
with whom SIMMS and HARGRAVE, JJ., join, dissenting.
Today’s opinion holds this appeal timely. Brought here from judgment on jury verdict, it was commenced within thirty days of the filing of a journal entry. Because the court’s opinion (1) ignores extant jurisprudence1 (teaching that an appealable event takes place when an unreserved general jury verdict is received by the clerk) (2) rejects the procedural coequality of public and private tort law, and (3) misapplies the prospectivity of Manning v. State ex rel. Dept. of Public Safety,2 I recede from its holding.
Ronnie Meadows…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rodgers v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Seymour v. SwartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Gunn v. Consolidated Rural Water & Sewer District No. 1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Manning v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- State Ex Rel. West v. McCaffertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.