Legal Opinion

Denny v. Crane

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 27, 1994No. 91-03414; CA A75326PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board denying compensability of his current condition and denying his aggravation claim. We affirm.

The facts, as found by the Board, are undisputed. Claimant sustained a compensable head injury on March 19, 1990, when he accidentally walked into a steel crane while at work at McKenney Crane (employer). Claimant returned to work 11 days after he was injured, but experienced severe daily headaches for several weeks. Although the headaches became less severe, claimant continued to have headaches and persistent pain in his neck and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Uris v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. PiwowarOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Albany General Hospital v. GasperinoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Kassahn v. Publishers Paper Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Save Beaver County v. Beaver CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API